Stop treating these people like savages Haitians have faced their tragedy with dignity and stoicism – not that you would know it from the way the disaster has been reported


Andy Kershaw


January 29, 2010

Just a couple of hours before the earthquake hammered poor Haiti, I was
reorganising my bookshelves at home. In the Haiti section I came across
a lovely old volume I’d bought from a wandering bookseller in
Port-au-Prince on one of my many visits to the former "Pearl of the
Antilles", once – incredibly – the richest colony in the world.

The book, Haiti Cherie, published in 1953, was clearly
intended for the souvenir stalls – in the days when Haiti had tourists.
The full-page photos show a Haiti, and particularly the architectural
splendours of Port-au-Prince, during what was known as la belle époque,
that period between the Second World War and the arrival, in 1957, of
the crazed Duvalier father-and-son dynastical dictatorship in the
now-crumpled presidential palace (which was designed and built by
British architects and engineers).

Even before the earthquake, and without the photographic evidence in
the book, it was scarcely credible that the already broken country and
the shattered streets of Port-au-Prince were once elegant and
glamorous. But until the dark night of Duvalierism came down, the
Haitian capital was a rival to Havana as the chi-chi tropical retreat
of Hollywood stars and the literati. Noël Coward was a regular at the
Hotel Oloffson, which, a decade later, would be the setting for Graham
Greene’s The Comedians, his mid-1960s not-so-fictional novel that blew
the whistle internationally on Duvalier’s terror.

The death of the old monster François Papa Doc Duvalier in 1971, and
the succession of his slow-witted teenage son, Jean-Claude Baby Doc
Duvalier, brought about a brief encore to la belle époque. Until it was
realised that the young playboy President was almost as bloodthirsty as
his father, celebrities sipped cocktails again in Port-au-Prince. Mick
Jagger inherited the creative perch on the Oloffson’s veranda, where he
wrote some of the Rolling Stones album, Emotional Rescue, in the
late-1970s. Jackie Onassis was often holed up in the privacy of
Habitation Leclerc, the capital’s most handsome estate.

Haiti will not be enjoying another belle époque for many generations.
Ravaged by the cancer of Duvalierism, self-serving military regimes,
predatory elites, the cruelties of previous US administrations’
realpolitik, and overpopulation it was – long before the horrors and
humiliations of last week – already a wreck, by the norms and measures
applied by reeling visitors from the affluent outside world.

And they are there again this week, rightly outraged, in huge numbers
and, no doubt, mostly well-intentioned. But many of these new arrivals
– aid workers, journalists, diplomats, politicians and soldiers – are
in Haiti for the first time. They cannot be blamed for not having been
there before but their inexperience of the country and their
unfamiliarity with Haitians seems to be contributing to the
catastrophe, rather than easing it.

The crisis, for more than a week now, has been not about the shortage
of donated food, water, fuel and medicines but the distribution of
those essentials that are piling up, obscenely, at Port-au-Prince
airport. On Monday evening’s Channel 4 News, Jon Snow, at that same
airport, interviewed the head of Oxfam in Haiti. Snow remarked that he
and his team had been to areas around the capital that had not had any
NGO visits, never mind material aid. The Oxfam woman spoke
authoritatively, but emptily, about how her teams were all over the
city conducting "assessments".

I’m certain every thirsty Haitian (water is a far more urgent priority
than food) is much-comforted and reassured that armies of clerical
teams from a leading NGO are all across town filling in forms.

(The runways, incidentally, at this allegedly grid-locked airport were,
during Snow’s broadcasts, disturbed by just one aircraft. The US
military, now running the control tower, says there is no room to park
more planes. Over Snow’s shoulder, one could see acre upon acre of
empty airport outfield.)

The alarmingly unanimous priorities of the spokesmen and women of aid
organisations and the military, have been with "issues" (for they love
that word) of "security", "procedures", and "logistics" (what we used
to call "transport" or "trucks"). These obsessions indicate not only a
self-serving and self-important careerist culture among some, though
not all, aid workers (although wide experience of the profession in
Haiti and across Africa tells me it is more common than donors would
like to think), but that the magnitude of the crisis has paralysed them
into a gibbering strike force of box-tickers. Most worryingly, it
reveals that many – even selfless – NGO workers on the ground haven’t a
clue about the country and its people.

There has now solidified a consensus among aid organisations that the
relief they are bringing is itself a liability; that distributing what
Haitians are dying for – literally – will bring on a second nightmare.
So, supplies pile up at the airport because, apparently, the Haitians
need to be fed and watered at gunpoint. And there aren’t enough men
with guns to provide this totemic "security" and there aren’t enough
trucks to move the supplies around the country. (Haiti is always
absolutely full of trucks. The first relief priority ought to be fuel
for those convoys, to deliver the water, medicines and food. In that
order).

This self-imposed blockade by bureaucracy is a scandal but could be
easily overcome. The NGOs and the military should recognise the
hysteria over "security" for what it is and make use of Haiti’s best
resource and its most efficient distribution network: the Haitians
themselves. Stop treating them as children. Or worse. Hand over to them
immediately what they need at the airport. They will find the means to
collect it. Fill up their trucks and cars with free fuel. Any further
restriction on, and control of, the supply of aid is not only
patronising but it is in that control and restriction where any
"security issues" will really lurk. And it is the Haitians who best
know where the aid is needed.

An unbelievable 10,000 charities were already working in Haiti when the
earthquake rocked the island, most of them tiny independent
organisations. Humanitarian aid is, almost by definition, never where
it is needed when natural disasters strike. But, in Haiti, what’s
needed has been flown in with impressive speed. Yet the combined
concern of all those organisations – many of them regarding fellow
charities as professional rivals – has so far been unable to get that
assistance a ride from the airport. Too much energy in the last week
has been expended on bickering about procedure and the fetish about
"security".

This assumption that there is a security threat has gone completely
unchallenged by an army of foreign press, equally unfamiliar with Haiti
and the character of the Haitians. Indeed, TV reporters particularly,
having exhausted the televisual possibilities of rubble, have been
talking up "security", "unrest" and "violence" when all available
evidence would indicate anything but.

Astonishingly, among these TV dramatists, I am sorry to say, is the
BBC’s Matt Frei. An incongruously ample figure around Port-au-Prince,
Frei has been working himself up all week into what is now a state of
near hysteria about "security" and the almost non-existent "violence".

Over the weekend we saw him anticipating an outbreak of unrest,
standing before a crowd of thousands of hungry, humiliated Haitians as
they waited, patiently and quietly, to be given rations by UN soldiers.
Their dignity and stoicism seemed to escape Frei who was, in any case,
looking away from them while ranting about the inevitability of looming
bloodshed – conspicuously unlikely, judging from the evidence of his
own report. (When he is not almost tumescent about violence, Frei
speculates and pontificates pompously to camera, or booms at earthquake
victims in French. Most Haitians don’t speak French. They speak Creole).

Frei’s reluctance to recognise the amazing self-control of these
desperate people, and instead to amplify the hysteria about violence
for which he has scant evidence, has brought him at times worryingly
close to calling the Haitians savages.

Disgracefully, on Monday’s Newsnight, Frei had the audacity – and
again, anything but the evidence – to declare: "The dignity of Haiti’s
past is long forgotten."

No, it certainly is not. And it took Bill Clinton, being interviewed by
Frei on Monday, to correct him on that one, and to point out that Haiti
still has dignity, immense quantities of it, especially in the present
catastrophe. Their chat was turned by Frei, inevitably, to his appetite
for imminent violence. "But what about this history of violence," he
asked, "and civil unrest in this country?"

"When you consider," explained Clinton, "that these people haven’t
slept for four days, haven’t eaten and have spent their nights
wandering the streets tripping over dead bodies, I think they’ve
behaved pretty well."

Clinton might have added that Haiti’s history of violence has been
state violence against its own people. And the Haitian enthusiasm for
civil unrest has always been directed bravely at brutal and corrupt
rulers.

Most journalists were also reporting breathlessly that Port-au-Prince’s
main prison had collapsed. Good story. But not for the reasons we were
told. The inexperience – and indeed arrogance – of every single
reporter who drew our attention to the jail, missed the real
significance of its destruction.

It was not that "violent criminals", "murderers", "gang bosses"
"notorious killers" or "drug dealers" had "simply walked out the front
gates". (And just how did these escapees miraculously avoid being
crushed to death in their cells?) Even if true, that was a minor detail
to the people of Port-au-Prince, who had more urgent concerns.

The true significance of the prison’s implosion was that it represented
for ordinary Haitians, like the wreckage of the presidential palace and
the city’s former central army barracks, exquisite revenge upon the
prime symbols of decades of state cruelty and oppression.

And many of the prison’s inmates were surely not the dangerous
stereotypes of these lurid reports. Haiti’s jails were, notoriously,
full of petty thieves and other unfortunates who shouldn’t have been in
there anyway. I once had to go into that Penitentiaire Nationale, where
I saw hundreds of men kept in cages, without room to lie down,
shuffling around literally ankle deep in their own shit, to get out of
there the son of a Haitian friend who’d been arrested so that the local
police could extort money from his father for the release of his boy.

Like their fellow arrivistes in the NGOs, most reporters now in the
country never saw Haiti in its everyday state of chaos and decay. They
simply have no appreciation that, while the earthquake has magnified
their misery, Haitians – rivalled, possibly only by the permanently
flooded Bangladeshis – are the world champions at survival and that
shortage, suffering, torment and the absence of infrastructure and
effective government are their norms.

Haitians are extremely industrious and always busy, even though there
are few formal jobs. They are resourceful, resilient, proud and
dignified. On all my visits I have marvelled at Haiti’s capacity not
just to survive but to function and even, at times, to flourish. (The
economy grew by 6 per cent last year. Things were on the up before the
earthquake dished it out again on poor Haiti.) It is a puzzle I have
never resolved and a fascination that has drawn me back to Haiti more
than 20 times: it shouldn’t work; nobody knows how it works; but
somehow or other it does.

And it will again. I am reluctant to recruit Bob Dylan into the rescue
and recovery operation in Haiti but, as Bob put it so neatly: "When you
ain’t got nothin’, you got nothin’ to lose…" No one understands that
better than the Haitians.

In the past, with nothing to lose, they kicked out the French,
overthrew colonialism with a slave rebellion and created the world’s
first black republic. Later, when still they had nothing, they chased
Baby Doc to the airport, into exile, and took on his Tonton Macoutes
death-squads with their bare hands. In 1990, against all odds,
predictions and expectations of routine state violence, they voted-in
their first democratically elected president.

Haitians certainly aren’t happy always to have nothing. But they are
accustomed to it. They are also adaptable and supremely skilled at
making lives for themselves amid rubble, and out of rubble, both
physical and political.

The pile of rubble today is more appalling and daunting than usual. But
in that remarkable Haitian way, every lump of it will be recycled and,
with it, the indefatigable Haitians will rise, rebuild and live again.

www.uruknet.info?p=62726

Link: www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/andy-kershaw-stop-treating-these-peop
   le-like-savages-1874218.html

Advertisements
This entry was posted in CURRENT EVENTS. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s