GORDON DUFF: SABROSKY INTERVIEW TIES ISRAEL TO 9/11

March 19, 2010 by Gordon Duff · 

DR ALAN SABROSKY, FORMER DIRECTOR OF STUDIES AT THE US ARMY WAR COLLEGE

“ISRAEL DID IT”

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

Meet Dr. Alan Sabrosky, a brave man, a USMC Vietnam vet, an American
of Jewish ancestry and someone devoted to the security of the United
States at any cost.   Ask any Jew what it takes to stand up against the
most powerful and ruthless group in the world, the Israeli lobby inside
the United States.

VIEW COMPLETE VIDEO INTERVIEW AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE 

YouTube – Veterans Today –

 

Sabrosky has been calling for a new 9/11
investigation for some time.  What makes him unique is that we have a
Jew who can hardly be called “self-hating” or “anti-Semitic” or against
Israel.  He is consistent in everything he says.  His point is that you
are an American or you are an Israeli but you can’t be both, especially
now with Zionism turning Israeli foreign policy into a “runaway
train.”  9/11, as Sabrosky sees it was the watershed in a relationship
between America and Israel that has gone from bad to unsurviveable,
especially for America.  He contents that AIPAC exercises near total
control over the electoral process in America through the ability to
outspend any other group and destroy anyone who stands against them.

The unwillingness of the US to stand with
the international community on humanitarian and war crime issues where
Israel is found in continual violation is, to Sabrosky, a critial
issue.  In discussion the US and her lack of support for the Goldstone
Report, Sabrosky says:

US criticism of the HRC resolution should be disregarded, as Washington only parrots Israel’s wishes here…

… it might have been better to have
included Goldstone’s condemnation of Hamas offenses as well, but it is
legitimate as it stands for five reasons: (1) Israel committed the
great majority of the violations; (2) Israel had an overwhelming
preponderance of military power; (3) Palestinians suffered almost all
of the death and destruction; (4) Israel has a long, sordid history of
ignoring UN commissions and resolutions, and of attacking UN facilities
and killing UN staff, as when the clearly marked UNRWA facility in Gaza
was bombed; and (5) the HRC focus is properly on the actions of the
oppressor (Israel) and not on those of the oppressed (the Palestinians).

Another is that it did not accord
Israel the right of self-defense. But Israel’s claim to self-defense in
its savaging of Gaza is specious, because Israel — like all occupiers
and oppressors — has no inherent right of self-defense against its
victims. Who, for instance, would have accepted Nazi Germany’s
assertion that its brutal reprisals against the Czechs for their
assassination of a Nazi commander named Reinhard Heydrich was an
exercise in self-defense? No one, and no one should accept Israel’s
claim, either.

A third is that holding Israel
accountable for its actions will somehow endanger the Middle East peace
process. But there is no peace process, simply meaningless discussions
to the dead end (for Palestinians and the rest of the region) of
Israeli hegemony, and under Netanyahu or any electable government in
Israel, there is not and cannot be one. There will be an enforced peace
imposed from outside of the Middle East, over the objections and
obstruction of Israel, or there will be none at all.

ZIONISM AND ISRAELI NATIONALISM

This is how Sabrosky describes the nature of Jewish nationalism as described within the term we call “Zionism”: 

The differences between Jewish nationalism (Zionism) and that of other countries and cultures here I think are fourfold:

1. Zionism is a real witches’ brew
of xenophobia, racism, ultra-nationalism and militarism that places it
way outside of a “mere” nationalist context — for example, when I was
in Ireland (both parts) I saw no indication whatsoever that the
Provisional Irish Republican Army or anyone else pressing for a united
Ireland had a shred of design on shoving Protestants into camps or out
of the country, although there may well have been a handful who thought
that way — and goes far beyond the misery for others professed by the
Nazis;

2. Zionism undermines civic loyalty
among its adherents in other countries in a way that other nationalist
movements (and even ultra-nationalist movements like Nazism) did not —
e.g. a large majority of American Jews, including those who are not
openly dual citizens, espouse a form of political bigamy called “dual
loyalty” (to Israel and the US) that is every bit as dishonest as
marital bigamy, attempts to finesse the precedence they give to Israel
over the US (lots of Rahm Emanuels out there who served in the Israeli
army but NOT in the US armed forces), and has absolutely no parallel in
the sense of national or cultural identity espoused by any other
definable ethnic or racial group in America — even the Nazi Bund in the
US disappeared once Germany and the US went to war, with almost all of
its members volunteering for the US armed forces;

3. The “enemy” of normal nationalist
movements is the occupying power and perhaps its allies, and once
independence is achieved, normal relations with the occupying power are
truly the norm, but for Zionism almost everyone out there is an actual
or potential enemy, differing only in proximity and placement on its
very long list of enemies (which is now America’s target list); and

4. Almost all nationalist movements
(including the irredentist and secessionist variants) intend to create
an independent state from a population in place or to reunite a
separated people (like the Sudeten Germans in the 1930s) — it is very
rare for it to include the wholesale displacement of another indigenous
population, which is far more common of successful colonialist
movements as in the US — and perhaps a reason why most Americans
wouldn’t care too much about what the Israelis are doing to the
Palestinians even if they DID know about it, is because that is no
different than what Europeans in North America did to the
Indians/Native Americans here in a longer and more low-tech fashion.

Sabrosky is one of the few Americans who
sees the nuclear threat of Israel as it is, blackmailing the United
States, not only in how it could be used to draw America into an
unwanted war, but how it could actually be used at some point to attack
the United States itself.  Only recently, Israel put Western Europe on
notice that it would be attacked if its actions threatened Israel,
attacked by nuclear weaons from Israel without warning.  Martin van
Creveld’s threat combined with Sabrosky’s analysis of Israeli
intentions and culpability for 9/11 brings to mind something Sabrosky
had once written.

He has always seen Moshe Dyan as a hero. 
Dyan saw Israel’s military role as that of a “junk yard dog,” ready to
bite without warning, attack anything and anyone.  Sabrosky notes that,
eventually such an animal is always put down or as he puts it,  ”the preferred response of everyone else is to kill that mad dog before it can decide to go berserk and bite.”

9/11

Sabrosky makes a case, not just for a
coverup of 9/11 but goes much further.  He points out as do so many
that the physics of the attack are unworkable.  He, however, is one of
the few to point to a conclusion many find obvious but few have the
nerve to admit, that it would have been impossible to stage 9/11
without the full resources of both the CIA and Mossad and that 9/11
served the interests of both agencies quite well.

There was nothing they could have wished for more.

Sabrosky also makes a point involving media coverage of 9/11:

Finally, we need
to take a hard look at why the mainstream media (MSM) have paid more
attention to Sarah Palin’s wardrobe than they have to dissecting
blatant falsehoods, discrepancies and inconsistencies in the US
Government’s treatment of 9/11 and its aftermath.

ZIONISM AND TREASON

The inescapable point isnt the 60,000
Americans killed or wounded in a war started out of treason or the
world it threatens to destroy.  Americans have been looking away from
these glaring realities the way they looked away from Vietnam. 
Sabrosky leaves Israel and her American Jewish supporters who he sees
as traitors with a warning:

If these Americans
and those like them ever fully understand just how much of their
suffering — and the suffering we have inflicted on others — is properly
laid on the doorsteps of Israel and its advocates in America, they will
sweep aside those in politics, the press and the pulpits alike whose
lies and disloyalty brought this about and concealed it from them. They
may well leave Israel looking like Carthage after the Romans finished
with it. It will be Israel’s own great fault.

Do we take Sabrosky seriously because he
is a Marine or a Jew?  Do we wonder why the things he says reach so
few?  Is American in a shooting war where our biggest enemy sits behind
us, killing us off, robbing us blind and whispering gently in our ears
how much they love us?

It would seem so.

YouTube – Veterans Today –

Advertisements
This entry was posted in 9/11. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s