The Complete Manual for The British Jewish Voter by Gilad Atzmon

Friday, April 30, 2010 at 8:01AM Gilad Atzmon

With
Britain’s three-way race for prime minister entering the final lap,
many Brits are still wondering who to vote for. As if it makes any
difference. However, if you are interested in my take on the subject, I
would suggest you opt for Nick Clegg and the Liberal Democrats. If you
want to know why, it is pretty simple – just because the Jews don’t
like Clegg at all. This is at least the impression I gathered after
reading the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA).

The JTA grasps that no single party is expected to capture a
majority of the British parliament in the May 6 ballot. They realise,
like the rest of us,  that the office of Prime Minister may go to
whichever party leader is able to secure a coalition deal or win the
support of another party. This is indeed horrible news for our
relentless Zionist fundraisers. Usually they buy just one party. In
fact, in this particular election, they already gambled on the
Conservatives. As it happens, now they have to buy all three leading
parties.

A few days ago the JTA published a manual for the British Jewish voter. As one might expect, the JTA and the Board of Deputies of British Jews
(BOD), a rabid Zionist institute that claims to represent British
Jewry, are convinced that British Jews are a top British political
priority. “One thing is certain,” says Rosalind Preston of the BOD,
“whoever is elected will have to deal with some very real and pressing
issues, not only on the national and international level, but as they
affect British Jews on the home front.”  British Jews, she said, are
concerned with “boycotts of Israeli goods, the spike of anti-Israeli
resolutions and speakers on university campuses.”

I myself would be far more optimistic if I knew that British Jewry
were actually concerned with war crimes committed in their names by the
Jewish state. This leaves us with a very clear picture, as much as a
growing number of Brits try to resurrect Britain’s stand on humanism,
the BOD and the JTA want this kingdom to continue to be subservient to
the interest of one tribe only.

Nick Clegg, the Lib Dems leader is not exactly the favorite
candidate as far as the BOD and the JTA are concerned. During the IDF’s
2009 genocidal attack on Gaza, Clegg penned an Op-Ed in the Guardian
newspaper calling on the Labour Government to "condemn unambiguously
Israel’s tactics" and demanded an “immediate arms boycott of Israel by
Britain and the European Union”. As much as it is transparent that
Clegg’s polite humanist stand is something the JTA disapproves of,
Brits should start to identify just who promotes murderous regimes and ideologies in the midst of their politics and media.

Last December Clegg was also the lead signatory of a letter
addressing the fact that Israel has 1.5 million Palestinian prisoners.
In addition he wrote that the legacy of Israel’s operation in Gaza is a
“living nightmare” for Gaza’s residents. Again, as much as the JTA is
disgruntled about Clegg’s public stance, the Brits should be very proud
to find such a voice of reason amid their overwhelmingly ‘Blue &
White’ funded politics.

We also have the story of the adorable Lib Dems, Jenny Tonge who the
Zionists despise. Tonge is a former member of Parliament who became a
member of the House of Lords in 2005. In 2004, Tonge said she would
become a suicide bomber if she had to suffer the indignities of the
Palestinians. In 2006 she suggested that the pro-Israel lobby had
"financial grips" on Britain and on her party. Last March she met with
Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal in Syria. Clearly the JTA doesn’t approve
of Tonge’s sincere refreshing call for justice. Last February, Tonge
requested an inquiry into the claim that the Israel Defense Forces’
earthquake relief teams in Haiti had harvested the organs of quake
victims.  Obviously, this claim was reasonable, considering the Israeli
share in the vast global market of organ trafficking.

Interestingly enough, Tonge’s remark prompted Clegg to fire her as
the party’s spokeswoman for health in the House of Lords. In fact this
act is something the Brits should take note of before giving their vote
to the Lib Dems and Nick Clegg. Indeed, like the Conservatives and New
Labour, the Lib Dems also have their ‘friends of Israel’.
At the end of the day, it appears that all major British parties find
it impossible to refuse the Zionist pound or shall I say the Shekel.
To eliminate any doubt in the matter, the Lib Dems spokesman reassured
the Jewish Chronicle that, ‘It was because they are friends of Israel
that they will be candid and critical.’

As one might expect, Jews want to punish Labour for its failure to 
comply with Jewish pressure. As the JTA reports, “Jews are upset with
Labour’s failure to amend the universal jurisdiction law that permits
private citizens to apply for the arrest of Israeli politicians for
alleged war crimes while they are on British soil.” This shouldn’t take
us by surprise. You cannot expect a ‘tribal’ operation to support
‘universal’ jurisdiction. Cameron (Conservatives) has said that he
would rescind the law. Clearly with 50%
of his shadow cabinet being members of the Conservative Friends of
Israel, I expect the protocols of his cabinet to also be transcribed
into Hebrew or at least Yiddish.

Brits may be shocked to find out that in the JTA’s review of the
British election there is not a single word about British national
interests. The article leaves the impression that Jews who live in
Britain for generations have zero interest in their neighbours. All
they are concerned with is the level of subservience of British
politicians to what they regard as Jewish interests (Israel and
Zionism).

But do not get the wrong impression. The JTA also has some positive
news for its  readers. According to the rabid Zionist media outlet,
some Jews also participate in the democratic game as equals amongst
equals. “In the midst of this year’s extraordinarily tight race,
candidates for Prime Minister and hopefuls in Jewish districts appear
to be stepping up their pandering to Jewish voters.” Geoffrey Alderman,
a historian of British Jewry, sees this as a positive development.
“Appealing for a Jewish vote is a sign of a vibrant democratic state,”
he said.

I hope British politicians might realise before it’s too late, that
there are some other migrant communities in this country that deserve
at least as much attention and care.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Palestine. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s