BP and Administration Lies, Deceit, and Coverup in the Gulf

by Stephen Lendman / May 22nd, 2010

From the start, Obama administration and BP officials lied and
deceived the public about the Gulf spill’s severity, BP CEO Tony Hayward
saying (on May 18) its environmental effect will be “very modest,”
when, in fact, it’s already catastrophic, spreading, causing long-term
or permanent ecological destruction over a vast area, will likely
persist for months, and, according to some experts perhaps years if
nothing tried to stop it works.

Initially, BP reported a 1,000 barrels per day leak, then 5,000 after
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) estimate,
while independent analysis of company supplied video and satellite
imagery suggest somewhere between 50-100,000 barrels, the consensus
settling on 70,000 or an Exxon Valdez equivalent every 3.5 days — by
far, America’s greatest ever environmental disaster, worsening daily.

On May 19, McClatchy Newspapers Marisa Taylor and Renee Schoof headlined,
“BP Withholds Oil Spill Facts — and Government Lets It,” saying:

It “hasn’t publicly divulged the results of tests on the extent of
workers’ exposure to evaporating oil or from the burning of crude… even
though researchers say that data is crucial in determining whether the
conditions are safe.”

Further, BP isn’t monitoring conditions or releasing videos, and the
Obama administration isn’t pressing it despite experts, like University
of Miami’s fisheries biologist Peter Ortner saying “We have been
screaming from day one for” it.

Meanwhile, University of Miami’s Rosenstiel School of Marine and
Atmospheric Science’s satellite imagery analysis reported on May 18 that
the spill covers 7,500 square miles, or about the size of New Jersey.
Other accounts say 10,000 square miles or a Maryland equivalent. Either
way, it’s huge.

On May 19, McClatchy Newspaper writers Renee Schoof and Lauren French
headlined,
“Gulf oil spill may be 19 times bigger than originally thought,”
saying:

New video footage “indicates that around 95,000 barrels, or 4 million
gallons, a day of crude oil may be spewing from the leaking wellhead,”
according to Purdue University’s Professor Steve Wereley’s May 19
testimony to the House Commerce and Energy Committee. He based his
calculation on BP video, saying the spill could be from 76,000-104,000
barrels daily, but wants more footage over a longer period for a more
precise calculation, what BP hasn’t released up to now and won’t, absent
Interior Department pressure to do it.

Yet if the wellhead fails completely, these figures potentially could
double, begging the question about how long Washington, BP, and the
major media can deny the peril, pretending it’s minor.

Wereley said the “media keeps using the 5,000 (figure), but there is
scientifically” no basis for its accuracy. “BP’s estimate is nowhere
near correct. It is certainly larger.” He sees no “possibility (under)
any scenario (that the publicized) number is accurate,” imagine how much
less so under a worst case scenario.

On May 14, the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) “filed a formal
notice of intent to sue Interior Secretary Ken Salazar for ignoring
marine-mammal protection laws when approving offshore drilling
operations in the Gulf of Mexico.”

Salazar’s Interior Department approved “three lease sales, more than
100 seismic surveys, and more than 300 drilling operations without
permits required by the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered
Species Act.”

According to CBD’s oceans director, Miyoko Sakashita:

On Salazar’s watch, the
Gulf was treated
“as a sacrifice area where laws are ignored and
wildlife protection takes a backseat to oil-company profits.” The
Interior Department “is well aware of its obligations under the law… yet
it has simply decided it cannot be bothered. You and I have to follow
the law, but Interior Secretary Salazar seems to think that he and the
oil companies he is supposedly overseeing do not. That is unacceptable.”

CBD is suing Salazar and the Minerals Management Service (MMS) for
flagrantly violating the Marine Mammal Protection Act and Endangered
Species Act. Hundreds of individual and class action ones have begun
coming against BP, Transocean, Halliburton and their complicit corporate
partners for compensatory and punitive damages, but whatever their
resolutions, they’ll never compensate for lost livelihoods, destroyed
lives, and environmental devastation that courts can’t redress.

Of course, the problem goes back decades and was extreme under the
Bush-Cheney White House, run by former oil men who cared only about
profits, and didn’t give a damn about the environment. Neither does
Obama and his corporate-controlled administration.

In 2007, Bush’s Interior Department sold BP the affected lease under
its 2007-2012 Five-Year Offshore Oil Drilling Plan. In April 2009, the
Obama administration approved exploratory drilling, after which CBD and
its allies won a court order vacating the Bush Five-Year Plan.

Rather than seek an alternative, Interior Secretary Salazar filed a
special motion to exempt approved Gulf sites, identifying BP’s as one to
be allowed. In July 2009, the court agreed, despite BP having the worst
environmental and safety records of any company operating in America.

No matter. It downplayed a spill possibility, saying it was unlikely
or virtually impossible. MMS then rubber-stamped its exploration plan
with no environmental consideration. In other words, it should never
deter business or stand in the way of profits — the same attitude shown
Wall Street, corporate health providers, and other corporate favorites
given generous legislative or direct handouts.

As a result, regular large and smaller spills are assured, heavy oil
from this one having reached the fragile Louisiana marshlands —
nurseries for shrimp, oysters, crabs, and fish that make Louisiana
America’s leading commercial seafood producer and a favorite tourist
destination for recreational anglers.

Oil also now affects the South Pass Mississippi River entrance, the
Mississippi delta, Gulf Shores and Dauphin Island, Alabama, Whiskey
Island on the Chandeleur Islands south end, the protected bird breeding
sanctuary Raccoon Island, and the Loop Current, a powerful clockwise
conveyor belt heading it toward Florida, up the East Coast, and into the
Atlantic, threatening Western Europe and perhaps West Africa. The
potential devastation is incalculable but at minimum will be huge.

According to European Space Agency satellite images, visible proof
shows its position, suggesting it’ll reach the Keys around May 25,
America’s only living coral barrier reef – the world’s third most
productive marine ecosystem with its patch and bank reefs, seagrass
meadows, soft and hard bottom communities, and coastal mangroves. They
support one of North America’s most biologically diverse amounts of
marine life, endangering them, according to Dr. Hu Chuamin, executive
director of the Institute for Marine Remote Sensing (IMaRS) at the
University of South Florida.

An optical oceanographic expert, he says there’s “no doubt that (oil)
will reach the Florida Keys. (Advancing about 100 miles a day), we know
that (Mississippi Rivers waters are heading for) the Florida Straits
and will impact the Keys.” Once there, major damage is likely to an
ecosystem providing shelter, food and breeding sites for many plants and
animals as well as coastal storm protection. According to Florida’s
Department of Environmental Protection, reefs also help the state’s
economy through millions of dollars annually from recreational and
commercial fishing.

No one knows the potential damage, but if oil flows over the reef,
the amount will depend on whether it stays on the surface. According to
Eugene Shinn, recently retired US Geologic Service reef ecology expert,
“Under no circumstances should dispersants be used on an oil slick in
the vicinity of a coral reef.” They would cause oil droplets to sink and
potentially destroy tiny coral polyps.

Worse still, the Loop Current joins the Gulf Stream, North America’s
most important ocean current system, sparking fears about oil entering
it and traveling up the entire East Coast into the Atlantic. En route,
it could foul beaches, mangroves, sea-grass, and coral reefs, vital to
area wildlife, local economies and human health, besides crossing the
Atlantic for more damage.

Earlier, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) head
,Jane Lubchenco, told reporters that an “unprecedented and dynamic”
slick was on course to sweep along Florida’s coastline, was
“increasingly likely” to reach the powerful Gulf Loop, then be carried
to the Keys and beyond.

No doubt to prevent his congressional testimony, MMS associate
director of Offshore Energy and Minerals Management, Chris Oynes, will
take an accelerated retirement May 31. He got his position despite being
key to an offshore leasing foul-up, costing taxpayers an estimated $10
billion in lost revenue — the Interior Department’s inspector general
calling his mismanagement “a jaw-dropping example of bureaucratic
bungling.”

So bad, in fact, he got a better job to rubber-stamp BP’s right to
operate recklessly, wreck the environment, and reward its shareholders
with billions in profits. Maybe a new high-paying job as well, the usual
revolving door payoff for allies leaving government service.

BP’s Criminal Negligence

Besides lying, covering up, and deceiving all along, BP knew the
vital blowout preventer was damaged weeks before the spill, yet did
nothing to fix it, according to a May 17 Judith Evans Timesonline
report headlined,
“BP pressured rig disaster workers to drill faster,” saying:

According to chief electronics technician Mike Williams, one of the
last workers to leave the doomed platform, the blowout preventer was
“damaged when a crewman accidently moved a joystick, applying hundreds
of thousands of pounds of force. Pieces of rubber were found in the
drilling fluid, which he said implied damage to a crucial seal. But a
supervisor declared the find to be ‘not a big deal.’ ”

Engineering Professor Bob Bea disagreed, telling 60 Minutes that
inaccurate pressure readings followed. The real situation was concealed.
The rig no longer was safe, and without blowout preventer protection,
“a catastrophic accident like the Gulf oil spill” might happen.

Bea also said BP ignored an even more critical safety measure,
ordering the rig operator to remove the “drilling mud,” the heavy liquid
used before the well was sealed to keep oil and gas from escaping.

MMS drilling engineer Frank Patton calls drilling mud “the most
important thing in safety for your well.” Explosion eyewitnesses,
including nearby fishermen, saw it being extracted beforehand. BP told
rig workers that “things” were plugged when, in fact, final cementing
wasn’t in place. Without it and the drilling mud, an operable blowout
preventer was the last line of defense. Drilling without it was willful
criminal negligence.

So wasn’t the whole operation, approved by Obama’s Interior
Department, including EPA’s authorizing the use of toxic dispersants,
causing more problems than solutions to the environment, wildlife,
affected residents, and fishermen hired as first responders, already
getting sick.

BP said respirators and other special protections weren’t needed,
despite strong hydrocarbon vapors and massive toxic chemical amounts
dumped on the slick to make it more water soluble.

As a result, fishermen report bad headaches, burning eyes, persistent
coughs, sore throats, stuffy sinuses, nausea, and dizziness —
unsurprising based on EPA monitored unsafe airborne levels of dangerous
hydrogen sulfide, benzene and other toxins, way exceeding acceptable
standards for humans and wildlife.

BP and Washington ignore them, risking chemical poisoning to show up
later in long-term illnesses, disabilities and deaths, what happened to
Exxon Valdez and 9/11 first responders, never told of the dangers they
faced. Again, expediency and corporate interests trump environmental
considerations, public health, worker safety, and common sense — swept
aside by Washington-BP collusion.

On May 20, with over 600,000 gallons of surface dispersants used and
another 55,000 underwater, the EPA told BP officials to choose less
toxic ones in 24 hours, submit a list of alternatives, then begin using
them within 72 hours.

According to Washington Post writer Juliet Eilperin (on May
20) in her article titled,
“EPA demands less-toxic dispersant”:

An unnamed administration official said “Dispersants have never been
used in this volume before,” let alone ones as toxic as Nalco’s Corexit
9500A and 9527A.

Nalco is well-connected, having formed a joint venture with Exxon
Chemical in 1994, has oil-industry insiders on its board, including an
11-year BP board member. No wonder Defenders of Wildlife’s senior policy
advisor, Richard Charter, calls Corexit “a chemical that the oil
industry makes to sell to itself, basically.” Only profits matter, not
long-term harm to people, wildlife and the environment.

Washington Coverup of a Massive Underwater Oil Blob

According to investigative journalist Wayne Madsen in his May 20
article headlined,
“White House Covers Up Menacing Oil ‘Blob’”:

FEMA and US Army Corps of Engineer sources say that “US Navy
submarines (in the Gulf and Atlantic off the Florida coast) have
detected (and are tracking) what amounts to a frozen oil blob… at depths
of between 3,000 to 4,000 feet. (It’s now) transiting the Florida
Straits between Florida and Cuba (and parts of it) are breaking off into
smaller tar balls that are now washing ashore in the
environmentally-sensitive Florida Keys and Dry Tortugas.”

Lies and coverup try to hide it, Madsen saying NOAA operates as a
“virtual public relations arm for BP,” and the Coast Guard is “lying in
order to protect the Obama administration” to limit its damaged image.

Six months ago, without federally required permits, the
BP/Transocean/Halliburton troika drilled a 35,000 foot well, causing “a
major catastrophic event that required the firms’ oil rig personnel to
quickly pull up the drill and close (its) hole.”

Even so, BP “re-sank the drill (causing) another, more destructive
chain of events following the (Deepwater Horizon) explosion…. When (it)
blew up, (it) also ‘blew down,’ cracking the sub-seabed pipe” as deep as
30,000 feet, “again, without a government permit.”

BP also wants to recover “as much oil as possible from the (site)
rather than simply plugging and capping (it), which would then place it
off-limits to further drilling.”

Company officials are deceiving the Obama administration and public
about their so-called “kill shot” or “top kill” plan to permanently seal
the well. Instead, they intend “to shoot cement into the pipe in an
attempt to cap” it temporarily, later hoping to dig “a trench for side
drilling (to) recover as much oil as possible,” no matter the risk of an
even greater disaster that won’t deter their quest for profits.

The Exxon Valdez Connection

Greg Palast’s Exxon Valdez fraud investigations found BP mostly to
blame, a topic his May 5 Truthout.org article explained, titled:
“Slick Operator: The BP I’ve Known Too Well.”

What the company did to Alaska, it’s now doing to the Gulf, and a
vastly greater ecosystem under a worst case scenario. “Tankers run
aground, wells blow out, pipes burst. It shouldn’t happen, but it does
(after which) the name of the game is containment,” coverup, and
spending the least amount possible for cleanup and restitution.

In Alaska and today, BP “was charged with carrying out the Oil Spill
Response Plans (it) drafted… filed with the government, and is handling
the same way by “l(ying), prevaricat(ing), fabricat(ing) and
obfuscat(ing).”

Spills are contained with “lot(’s) of rubber, long skirts of it
called a ‘boom’ (used to) surround (them), then pump (them) out into
skimmers, or disperse it, sink it or burn it.”

However, “booms” have to be ready to respond like a fire department’s
equipment and personnel to operate it. In Alaska, it was BP’s job as
principal Alyeska pipeline consortium owner — its same job in the Gulf
as principal Deepwater Horizon lessee.

In 1989, Alyeska claimed that equipment and response crews were in
place with trained Alaskan natives ready if needed. It also “certified
in writing that a containment barge with equipment was within five hours
sailing of any point in the Prince William Sound, (and that) it had
plenty of boom and equipment cached on Bligh Island, where the Exxon
Valdez hit Bligh Reef.

In fact, it had nothing there, and Alyeska earlier fired Alaskan
workers, “replacing them with phantom crews, lists of untrained
employees with no idea how to control a spill. And the containment barge
(in fact was) laid up in a drydock in Cordova, locked under ice, 12
hours away.” Instead of containing the spill, 1,200 miles of shoreline
were wrecked, contaminated enough to remain so for decades at minimum.

For a company with the worst safety and environmental record in the
industry “here we go again. Valdez goes Cajun” with contagion enough to
contaminate vast parts of the Gulf, Florida Keys, fragile ecosystems,
and the entire US East coast and beyond.

This goes way beyond BP and its decades of criminal negligence. It’s a
regulatory problem for lack of it; a government one for no oversight,
public or environmental concern; and a long-term systemic one giving
business free reign to plunder and pollute without limit, then when
caught call it an accident, paper it over, and repeat again because
complicit government officials allow it.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. Contact him at: lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
Also visit his blog site
and listen to The Global Research News Hour on
RepublicBroadcasting.org Mondays from 11AM-1PM US Central time for
cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests. All programs are
archived for easy listening. Read other
articles by Stephen
.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in News and politics. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s