JEFF GATES: Watching Israel Delegitimize the United States of America

27. May, 2010 

What’s behind the sudden crisis in Korea? Who benefits?

Which nation’s nuclear arsenal is problematic?

The U.S.-Israeli relationship has long been America’s Achilles heel.
Our first president warned against “entangled alliances” particularly
when, as here, there’s a “passionate attachment.”

Our “special relationship” with this rogue state has placed the U.S.
outside the same system of international law that we now seek to impose
on others, including Iran.

Our handling of the current crisis on the Korean peninsula could restore our tattered reputation.

What’s the first issue that needs to be addressed?

Here’s where you the reader may well ask: “Do you mean the issue
concerning the collapse of Building 7 of the World Trade Center?” No,
but nor is that question irrelevant to this latest crisis.

Here’s the second issue that must be addressed: to which nations has
Israel transferred nuclear weapons or nuclear weapons technology? Is
North Korea on the list?

That issue became relevant with the release of The Unspoken Alliance: Israel’s Secret Relationship with Apartheid South Africa.
Archival research by author Sasha Polakowsky-Suransky uncovered “top
secret” minutes of a military agreement signed in April 1975 between
Shimon Peres, now president of Israel, and South Africa’s defense
minister P.W. Botha.

Though Israel denies the conclusions reached by reporters for The Guardian (U.K.), the agreement suggests an offer of nuclear weapons while its Apartheid regime was under international sanctions.

Israel was then building a surrogate arms industry in South Africa
using what was, in practical effect, slave labor. That industry has
since moved to Israel where it employs “guest workers.” Peres was
responsible for building Israel’s nuclear program with help from France
in the 1950s.

Some weeks before the offer, Israel and South Africa signed a covert
agreement (code name Secment) governing their military alliance. In the
subsequent meetings, “correct payload” was used to describe the nuclear
warheads Israel would provide for a Jericho missile system. As The Guardian explained:

“The use of a euphemism, the ‘correct payload’, reflects Israeli
sensitivity over the nuclear issue and would not have been used had it
been referring to conventional weapons… the only payload the South
Africans would have needed to obtain from Israel was nuclear. The South
Africans were capable of putting together other warheads.”

South Africa did not go ahead with the deal it was offered though it
did develop its own nuclear weapons, possibly with Israeli assistance.
The Apartheid government revealed the program to Nelson Mandela when he
became president.

In 1986, nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu revealed Israel’s nuclear weapons program to the Sunday Times
(London). Vanunu was kidnapped by Mossad agents in Rome and returned
for trial in Israel. Sentenced to 18 years, he served 11 years in
solitary confinement. On May 23rd, he was sentenced to
another three months in prison for breaking the terms of his release by
having unauthorized meetings with foreigners.

Evil Doers vs. Evil Doing

Even now Israel strives against all odds to maintain “ambiguity”
about its nuclear weapons. But how can you offer nuclear weapons you
don’t have?

Who provided nuclear technology to North Korea? That backward state,
now nuclear-armed, was included in G.W. Bush’s post-911 “Axis of Evil”
speech. Care to guess which Israeli-American wrote that speech?

Shortly thereafter the U.S. invaded Iraq to remove an Evil Doer.
Only later did we learn that our “flawed” intelligence was “fixed”
around a goal long sought by Israel as chronicled in A Clean Break, a strategy document written for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by a team of Israeli-Americans led by Richard Perle.

In 2001, Perle became chairman of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Review Board.

The United Nations has long been scheduled to review the 1968
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and to consider the creation of a
Middle East free of nuclear weapons. As the date approached, the world
community experienced a well-timed torpedo attack on a South Korean
warship, reportedly by a North Korean submarine.

In the midst of these negotiations, mainstream media has been
flooding the national consciousness with power-of-association stories
about Iran, its nuclear program and even its links to North Korea.
Tehran, of course, was the third member in the trio of Bush-era Evil

News outlets controlled by Israeli-American Rupert Murdoch are particularly active, including Fox News and The Wall Street Journal.

Is it true that Tel Aviv transferred to Pyongyang a German-made submarine? If so, does that qualify as evil doing?

Perhaps here is a good place to pose an out-of-sequence question: What about the collapse of Building 7?

Master Myth Makers

Does Israel routinely transfer war materiél to nations subject to international sanctions?

That would help explain their status as the world’s third largest
arms exporter. The U.S. holds first place with Russia second. Israel
and France vie for third and fourth trailed by the U.K. and China in
the Dirty Half Dozen.

If Israel has an extensive arsenal of nuclear weapons, why does the U.S not insist on inspections?

How does U.S. protection of Israel’s illegal conduct advance U.S. interests?

How is our conduct consistent with the behavior we are now pressing on Iran?

What is so valuable about the U.S.-Israeli relationship that we
should sacrifice our credibility to cover-up violations of
international law that make us appear guilty by association?

By law isn’t the U.S. obliged to support U.N. sanctions for Israel?

Why discredit the U.S. and undermine the stature of the United
Nations? Wasn’t the U.N. the post-WWII organization founded in large
part by the U.S. to discourage just such behavior?

Serial Provocations and Murderous Misdirection

Instead of sanctions, what do we see instead? Misdirection and intimidation.

The Internet is awash with Men in Black accounts featuring the usual
array of conspiracies. Elvis may yet be blamed for a Korean peninsula
incident that could ignite a nuclear war in the region.

How long before we see a story blaming Hezbollah terrorists led by
the Pakistan Taliban aboard an Iranian submarine advised by Syrian
nuclear scientists and Palestinian strategists?

Or aliens.

The stage has been set for another 911, possibly featuring a nuclear
incident. A series of “plausible” Evil Doers have been prominently
featured in assorted “terrorist incidents.”

Enough pre-staging has been done that Americans again feel insecure following the media coverage given the Ft. Hood shooting, the Christmas Day Bomber and now the Times Square Terrorist.

One small problem: none of these storylines hold up under close
scrutiny. But then that’s not the point. Neither did the “intelligence”
on which we relied to wage war in Iraq in response to the provocation
of 911. It didn’t need to be true, just believable.

Time to Redo the Report

Anyone of substance associated with the report of the 911 Commission
knows we still need a good faith investigation. Mainstream Europeans
routinely call for it. Those demands are routinely couched in code due
to the perils facing those in the EU who question our “special

Instead, commentators ask about the “collapse” of Building 7. Good question. Also a fair question. The answer could lead somewhere useful. Therefore, don’t ask, don’t tell.

This entangled alliance has been an exercise in deceit since a
Christian-Zionist president, a Democrat, was induced to extend
recognition to an enclave of extremists.

Harry Truman dismissed the concerns of the Joint Chiefs who warned
him about their “fanatical concepts” and their plans for “military and
economic hegemony over the entire Middle East.”

We were deceived by our own better nature
to embrace a relationship that has long been at odds with our national
interest. The durability of the relationship has long failed to pass
muster as either rational or consistent with our values. The
relationship has changed for the worse who we are as a nation.

Yet somehow the relationship endures. Along with the perceived legitimacy of this “state.”

Deception and Self-Deceit

Its persistence can be traced to the strength of a lobby that, to date, has escaped registration as a foreign agent. Those known for their skill at waging war “by way of deception” have routinely betrayed the nation that first befriended and most reliably defended them.

Even when a Christian-Zionist president, a Republican, led us to war
on fixed intelligence, we were unable to identity the common source of
our troubles. Some blamed G.W Bush. Others now blame Barack Obama. Both
critiques miss the point. This treachery is now systemic and thoroughly
imbedded in both political parties.

Even now, an undisclosed media bias blocks Americans from the facts
they require to make an informed choice about this relationship. And
about the legitimacy of a transnational operation that murders with
impunity (as in Dubai) and provokes with pleasure—anywhere they please.

Americans are now emerging from many quarters to resist the
influence wielded on (and from within) our government by special
interests. This special relationship often tops the list.

Many supporters of Israel have been deceived to believe that this
relationship is in their best interest. The facts confirm
otherwise. Like the nation itself, they too were “the mark” in this long-running fraud.

We have been seduced by those masterful at deceit to freely embrace
the very forces that delegitimized us as a nation and collapsed our
economy from within.

Which brings me back to the question: what about Building 7?

Jeff Gates is a widely acclaimed author, attorney, investment
banker, educator and consultant to government, corporate and union
leaders worldwide. He served for seven years as counsel to the U.S.
Senate Committee on Finance. He is widely published in the trade,
popular and academic press.  His Website: His latest book is Guilt by Association: How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War. His previous books include Democracy at Risk: Rescuing Main Street From Wall Street and The Ownership Solution: Toward a Shared Capitalism for the 21st Century.

Read More at his website:

This entry was posted in News and politics. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s