Not Voting and STILL Complaining

by L.J. Holman / July 8th, 2010

It is an old and tired truism: “If you don’t vote, you have no
right to complain.” The idea supposedly is that voting is a privilege, a
price one pays to live in the land of the free, and so integral to the
democratic process that not voting is somehow un-American, that not
voting means not participating (the implication is that one doesn’t WANT
to participate) in our democracy, and therefore whatever happens in
that democracy is outside the non-voter’s rights and privileges—but can
this really be correct?

To take just one of the strands of this
bumper-sticker idea, voting is not a privilege. A privilege would be
shaking Nelson Mandela’s hand or having a key to the executive washroom.
Voting is mostly a waste of time and most people know it. They know
that voting is a sham, a sideshow, an attempt to convince people that
they DO participate, when in fact, voting is a manipulation of the
natural patriotic and altruistic instinct Americans (and any other
humans) have to do right and make things better. But money rules our
politics (as the Supreme Court recently made VERY clear) and only the
wealthy or those well-connected to money or those who are attractive to
others with money, can run effectively for office, so any voter can
choose between one very rich person or another rich one. Meg Whitman,
the Republican nominee for governor in California, spent over 45 million
dollars (a lot of it her own money) just to get the nomination, and may
top 150 million in the general campaign. No one who runs for office
above the level of dogcatcher can afford to go without some measure of
financial support from a monied interest, an interest who will come back
later—should the candidate win—to see a return on investment. Does
anyone really still believe that spending 35 million dollars to be a
senator is exclusively a patriotic act? To believe voting is “the will
of the people” is to believe that Thomas Jefferson will rise from the
grave next week.

Voting is a sop to Cerberus, which even the dullness and vapidity of
American discourse cannot hide or justify. If the choices a voter have
are just copies from one template, why should anyone even bother if the
template, itself, is flawed? This is not to say that all politicians
are graft-ridden or unresponsive to their constituents, but it is to say
that the very system we are encouraged (and harangued) to use validates
this corrupted version of “representation.”

But if voting is the only accepted way to participate in a democracy,
how can anyone who has NOT voted—that is, NOT participated (by
definition)—lay claim to any right to critique public policy or
politicians? This line of reasoning hides two assumptions: 1) that
voting is the only sure way of participating, and 2) only voters are
affected by policy decisions.

The first assumption is patently false. There are many ways to
participate in a democracy and we are seeing that today. I don’t mean
the Tea Party, however, which is still operating under the old
assumptions: that THEY will replace “bad” politicians and policy with
THEIR “good” politicians and policy by appealing to voters, but using
the same broken system. This just replaces one acidic compound for
another—neither drinkable. One viable—and certain traditionally
American way—is to rally around one’s community, in a myriad of ways.
The Fourth of July celebrations across the nation were a good example of
this. With so many communities unable to scrape up money in these
financially-ridiculous times, private citizens paid for some, elected
officials paid for some (maybe as a voter-incentive for the next
election?), corporations were asked to finance others (good PR for
them—BP in Texas, but they signed on before the spill), and in other
communities, there were no fireworks, but there WERE community barbeques
and ceremonies honoring patriotism and all that stuff liberals don’t
like to talk about and conservatives talk about WAY too much—neither
knows what it is they are speaking about.

Things do get done, politicians do implement good policies, but the
bulk of the action which is accomplished in the name of the people is
generated BY the people, many of whom are not voters, but who ARE
affected by the venality, back-door dealings, pork-trading,
earmark-grabbing people who got the majority of the 30% of the people
who bother to vote on any particular election day. Voting is a mirage,
which promises action and democracy and progress, but there is no water
out there on the road; when you get there, it’s gone, to be replaced by
another shimmering pool further on.

So, as it stands now, voting is a circus—not bread AND circus: the
bread has already been baked and eaten—to take our minds off what’s
going on behind the curtain. And if you live here, get services here,
send your kids to school here, pay taxes here, send your kids off to war
here, then you have the right to complain—just by virtue of your
presence here, whether you vote or not. But complaining is more than
just working your jaw: it is community activism, picking up trash on
your road, keeping up with current events, hitting every blog and
Twitter-like place you can find. Don’t even bother writing your
“representative” because he or she never answers, except to send a form
email saying your interest and comments are appreciated, which means
it’s never read by anyone higher than a staffer whose main job is to get
the cappuccino machine cleaned every day.

Of course, the ultimate complaint is non-compliance. It is easier,
more effective, and more patriotic (remember the non-compliant colonists
who didn’t pay their taxes?) I remember the oil embargo of the 70’s
and that California changed the speed limit to 55, so we could save
gas…but no one was going 55. The CHP wrote bales of tickets, but
drivers had to get to work, truckers had to make their hauls on time,
and no one complied as people on the L.A. freeways still tailgated each
other at 90 miles per hour and people driving a block to the AM/PM to
get coffee backed out of their driveways at half the speed of light. No
one I ever saw during those times ever obeyed the limit, even
accidentally—the ultimate complaint. Eventually, the “crisis passed,”
as the authorities said, realizing that no one was obeying the law, that
people were voting with their accelerators, and the speed limit was
moved back up—Jeffersonian democracy at its most practical and potent.

If Americans want to live in a better place, then maybe they should
start by ignoring what politicians want them do, and concentrate on what
is NEEDED in their communities and neighborhoods. If they run afoul of
the law, then maybe the law is crap and should be run afoul of. So I
may not vote for a local office or two, or maybe not at all, but I will
complain in my own fashion. It’s truly the American way.

L.J. Holman is an adjunct philosophy instructor at
College of the Desert, in Palm Desert, CA. He can be reached at: Read other articles by

This entry was posted in Organizations. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s