The ‘Mosque’ Affair: An American Comedy

August 22, 2010 posted by Michael Leon · 14 Comments 

New York City Mayor Bloomberg supporting the mosque project

So virulent is the Islamophobic hysteria of the neocon and Fox News right — abetted by the useful idiocy of the Anti-Defamation League, Harry Reid
and other cowed Democrats — that it has also rendered Gen. David
Petraeus’s last-ditch counterinsurgency strategy for fighting the war
inoperative. How do you win Muslim hearts and minds in Kandahar when
you are calling Muslims every filthy name in the book in New York
? –

By Frank Rich in the NYT – Excerpt:

THE “ground zero mosque,” as you may well know by now, is not at ground zero. It’s not a mosque but an Islamic cultural center containing a prayer room.
It’s not going to determine President Obama’s political future or the
elections of 2010 or 2012. Still, the battle that has broken out over
this project in Lower Manhattan — on the “hallowed ground” of a
shuttered Burlington Coat Factory store one block from the New York Dolls Gentlemen’s Club
— will prove eventful all the same. And the consequences will be far
more profound than any midterm election results or any of the grand
debates now raging 24/7 over the parameters of tolerance, religious
freedom, and the real estate gospel of location, location, location.

Here’s what’s been lost in all the screaming. The prime movers in
the campaign against the “ground zero mosque” just happen to be among
the last cheerleaders for America’s nine-year war in Afghanistan. The
wrecking ball they’re wielding is not merely pounding Park51, as the
project is known, but is demolishing America’s already frail support
for that war, which is dedicated to nation-building in a nation whose
most conspicuous asset besides opium is actual mosques.

So virulent is the Islamophobic hysteria of the neocon and Fox News right — abetted by the useful idiocy of the Anti-Defamation League, Harry Reid
and other cowed Democrats — that it has also rendered Gen. David
Petraeus’s last-ditch counterinsurgency strategy for fighting the war
inoperative. How do you win Muslim hearts and minds in Kandahar when
you are calling Muslims every filthy name in the book in New York?

You’d think that American hawks invested in the Afghanistan “surge”
would not act against their own professed interests. But they couldn’t
stop themselves from placing cynical domestic politics over country.
The ginned-up rage over the “ground zero mosque” was not motivated by a
serious desire to protect America from the real threat of terrorists
lurking at home and abroad — a threat this furor has in all likelihood
exacerbated — but by the potential short-term rewards of winning votes
by pandering to fear during an election season.

We owe thanks to Justin Elliott of Salon
for the single most revealing account of this controversy’s evolution.
He reports that there was zero reaction to the “ground zero mosque”
from the front-line right or anyone else except marginal bloggers when
The Times first reported on the Park51 plans in a lengthy front-page article on Dec. 9, 2009.
The sole exception came some two weeks later at Fox News, where Laura
Ingraham, filling in on “The O’Reilly Factor,” interviewed Daisy Khan,
the wife of the project’s organizer, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf. Ingraham gave the plans her blessing. “I can’t find many people who really have a problem with it,” she said. “I like what you’re trying to do.”

As well Ingraham might. Rauf is no terrorist. He has been repeatedly sent on speaking tours by the Bush and Obama State Departments alike to promote tolerance in Arab and Muslim nations. As Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic reported last week, Rauf gave a moving eulogy at a memorial service for Daniel Pearl,
the Wall Street Journal reporter murdered by Islamist terrorists in
Pakistan, at the Manhattan synagogue B’nai Jeshurun. Pearl’s father was
in attendance. The Park51 board is chock-full of Christians and Jews.
Perhaps the most threatening thing about this fledgling multi-use
community center, an unabashed imitator of the venerable (and Jewish)
92nd Street Y uptown, is its potential to spawn yet another coveted,
impossible-to-get-into Manhattan private preschool.

In the five months after The Times’s initial account there were no
newspaper articles on the project at all. It was only in May of this
year that the Rupert Murdoch axis of demagoguery revved up, jettisoning
Ingraham’s benign take for a New York Post jihad. The paper’s inspiration was a rabidly anti-Islam blogger best known for claiming that Obama was Malcolm X’s illegitimate son. Soon the rest of the Murdoch empire
and its political allies piled on, promoting the incendiary libel that
the “radical Islamists” behind the “ground zero mosque” were tantamount
either to neo-Nazis in Skokie (according to a Wall Street Journal columnist) or actual Nazis (per Newt Gingrich).

Advertisements
This entry was posted in CURRENT EVENTS. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s